[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoringMSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3
>>> "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> 24.11.08 12:03 >>> >With this patch, MSI/MSI-X capabilities and tables are saved in Dom0 when >S3 and restored when resume. Actually, this is also the approach that >kernel takes. The only concern is that Dom0 should not touch MSI/MSI-X, >they are owned by VMM itself. Maybe adding a hypercall to instruct Xen to >do the saving/restoring is good. I wonder whether the reason is strong >enough for adding a hypercall for such purpose. Is it at all necessary to use a hypercall here? Shouldn't Xen itself be able to do the necessary saving/restoring (just like it does for IO-APIC)? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |