[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support
[Yunhong Jiang] > This patch try to do some cleanup for these issues. > 1) The basic idea is to remove the pci_dev's lock, instead, we try > to use the big pcidevs_lock to protect the whole pci_dev > stuff. It including both pci_dev adding/removing, and also the > assignment of the devices. We checked the code and seems there is > no critical code path for this. We try to use fine-grained lock > and seems the code will be very tricky. > 2) Split the pci_enable_msi into two step, firstly it will just > construct the msi_desc through pci_enable_msi without holding the > irq_desc lock, and then it will setup msi through setup_msi_irq > with irq_desc holded. > 3) Change the iommu->lock and hd->mapping_lock to be irq_save. > 4) Fix to some minor issues. > Now the lock sequence is: pcidevs_lock -> domai's event_lock -> > iommu's lock -> hvm_iommu's mapping_lock. The irq_desc's lock will > always be the last lock be hold for peformance consideration. So what exactly is it that pcidevs_lock is supposed to "protect" now? Does it indicate that someone is holding a reference to a pci_dev? Does it indicate that someone will modify some pci_dev? Does it indicate that someone is messing around with interrupts or MSI descriptors? Regarding pci_enable_msi: Can you not get into race conditions with the splitup you're doing? pci_enable_msi() does afterall poke around in the MSI capability record. eSk _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |