[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence
On 11/12/2008 00:23, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is it really safe to use NOW() before init_percpu_time()? Seems dodgy. > > Where did you mean by using NOW before init_percpu_time? > I moved do_settime earlier but with a zero system stamp now > which matches the line behind to init stime_platform_time to zero. > To me there's no difference to initialize wallclock at zero point > or sometime after with a NOW() drift, which should cause similar > result to wc_sec/wc_nsec. init_platform_time() -> plt_overflow() -> NOW() Perhaps the above is safe though? Will NOW() return zero for an uninitialised per-cpu time sstructure (since stime_local_stamp and tsc_scale are both zero)? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |