[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval"
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Steve Prochniak <sprochniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All Microsoft 6.0 and beyond Operating Systems have a sense of > 'enlightment' which means they try to talk to the underlying hypervisor > - and if there is one, they do certain things like turn off 101 > bugchecks. The only real way to get Vista and beyond to work correctly > with SMP is to make Xen conform to Microsoft's hypervisor spec. I vaguely recall there being a way to make xen "lie" to the OS about the type of hypervisor, it might only be a feature on the commercial citrix xenserver? So basically there is no way to run Windows Vista or 2008 on Xen without risk of a 101 BSOD under load? If that is true then its a severe problem and Xen is useless for newer MS OS's :( Has anybody else had this problem and found a solution? Andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Lyon > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:34 PM > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen-Devel (E-mail) > Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied > onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval" > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When dom0 is under heavy load any Vista or Windows 2008 HVM's that are >> running and have multiple cpu's assigned often BSOD with code >> 0x00000101 "A clock interrupt was not recevied ona secondary >> processor within the allocated time interval" >> >> It only happens if the load in dom0 is high enough to make the mouse >> pointer lagged, once the mouse fails to track in realtime the hvm's >> start to bsod within a few seconds. >> >> I have tried several versions of Xen including 3.2, 3.3 and 3.3.1 rc4, >> and various kernels including the 2.6.18 xensource and 2.6.27-xen.hg. >> >> Here is a example config from one of my vista hvms, is there a >> timer/rtc setting that I need to add to avoid this problem? >> >> import os, re >> arch = os.uname()[4] >> if re.search('64', arch): >> arch_libdir = 'lib64' >> else: >> arch_libdir = 'lib' >> kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" >> builder='hvm' >> memory = 2048 >> name = "Vistax86" >> uuid = "b7bd2f2f-169f-4789-8aee-eaa77c543c99" >> vcpus=8 >> vif = [ 'mac=00:16:3e:7d:bc:b1' ] >> disk = [ 'phy:/dev/vg_raptor/lv_vistax86,hda,w', ',hdc:cdrom,r' ] >> device_model = '/usr/' + arch_libdir + '/xen/bin/qemu-dm' >> boot="d" >> sdl=0 >> vnc=1 >> vnclisten="127.0.0.1" >> vncdisplay=11 >> vncpasswd='vv8176a' >> stdvga=0 >> serial='pty' >> usbdevice='tablet' >> > cpuid=['1:edx=xxx1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ebx=xxxxxxxx00010000xxxxx > xxxxxxxxxxx','4,0:eax=001111xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'] >> keymap='en-gb' >> >> Andy >> > > I think this is a known issue which has incorrectly been marked as > FIXED in bugzilla: > > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 > > there is a second bug report of the same problem, this time with more > details: > > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1065 > > Is there a fix? > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |