[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Xen c/s 18943

To: "Xiaohui Xin" <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:48:36 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:48:23 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

I'm having the impression that this change is incomplete: Shouldn't the checks
close to the beginning of p2m_set_entry() and
guest_physmap_mark_populate_on_demand() also be constrained to AMD?

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xen c/s 18943
  - From: Xin, Xiaohui

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b)
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen c/s 18943
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Problem with starting guest (para_virt dom0)
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen c/s 18943
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.