[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was:xen_phys_startfor32b)
On 20/01/2009 09:11, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> *must* be accompanied by a tools change in order to be usable >> >> Yes, I see that it would be a must for your different paradigm, >> but less important in the one I am accustomed to. > > Since there's no dom0_mem used by default in -unstable, the 'must' > applies there too. We do specify one for our internal automated tests however. Really we do not test the auto-ballooner. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |