[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 kernel failure with ata_piix / irq problems
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:01:59PM +0000, Andrew Lyon wrote:I just upgraded to newly released Xen 3.3.1 hypervisor but unfortunately it didn't seem to help with my problem.. I still get the exact same errors with ata_piix module: http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-4-xen331.txt xen_allocate_pirq: returning irq 30 for gsi 18 xen_set_ioapic_routing: irq 30 gsi 18 vector 160 ioapic 0 pin 18 triggering 0 polarity 1 ata_piix 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 30 xen: PCI device 0000:00:1f.1 pin 1 -> irq 30 xen: disable pci device 0000:00:1f.1 ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:1f.1 failed with error -38I don't think the problem is ata_piix, I've tried the pv_ops dom0 kernel on a Dell Optiplex 755 and unbranded system with gigabyte motherboard, on both systems none of the storage devices worked, including ahci, ata_piix, I even tried putting the root filesystem on a usb storage device but that too is broken, I think interrupt routing is not working at all perhaps? I'm going to do more testing this weekend...Hello. I just did some more testing too.. I upgraded to the latest patches for Linux 2.6.29-rc1-tip log of xen+kernel from serial console: http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-5-xen331-linux-2.6.29-rc1.txt (XEN) Command line: dom0_mem=1024M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all com1=19200,8n1 console=com1 Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/vg00/lv01 console=hvc0 earlyprintk=xen pci=nomsi And the failing part of the log is here: xen_allocate_pirq: returning irq 30 for gsi 18 xen_set_ioapic_routing: irq 30 gsi 18 vector 160 ioapic 0 pin 18 triggering 0 polarity 1 ata_piix 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 30 xen: PCI device 0000:00:1f.1 pin 1 -> irq 30 xen: disable pci device 0000:00:1f.1 Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.29-rc1-tip #3 That means that the ata-piix driver decided it was unhappy for some reason, and decided to fali with ENODEV. It would be very interesting to know what part of the device probe failed. From the Xen perspective, it looks like everything went OK. (This is just a reminder to me to implement this function; it only got called because ata-piix had already decided to fail and was unregistering its resources.)Call Trace: [<c06dd32e>] ? printk+0xf/0x11 [<c04079bc>] xen_pci_pirq_disable+0x18/0x1c J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |