[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] setup_irq/request_irq/free_irq fixups
On 06/02/2009 11:24, "Espen Skoglund" <espen.skoglund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Make setup_irq/request_irq/free_irq take vector param instead of >>> irq param > >> Do you really think that's an improvement? > > Yes. Some interrupts, e.g., for handling IOMMU faults, do not need to > be associated with a pirq. They just need to have a vector allocated > to them. The way this used to work, the caller would have to invent a > IRQ to go with the vector (typically irq := vector) befor calling the > function. My reading of the patch was that you simply pushed irq_to_vector() out into every caller. I therefore just took the ->shutdown() fix for free_irq() and dropped the rest. I checked in the rest of your patches. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |