[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Align periodic vpts


  • To: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:23:05 +0000
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:23:38 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcmMOKb7clHaVWfpTWKVxXzVWUXrbAAAnSRH
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH] Align periodic vpts

On 11/02/2009 11:05, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> + * CAUTION:
> + * While vlapic timer ticking too close to the pit.  We saw a userspace
> + * application getting the wrong answer because long CPU bound sequences
> + * appeared to run with zero CPU time. This only showed up with old Linux
> + * kernels (IIRC, it was with Red Hat 3 U8). So this option may cause a
> + * regression in this case.
> + */
> +static int opt_align_periodic_vpt = 0;
> +boolean_param("align_periodic_vpt", opt_align_periodic_vpt);
> +

Presumably there are common cases where not aligning vlapic too has
significant power overheads? Personally I'm not sure I care too much about a
minor regression on RH3, if this patch is worthwhile at all I think it
should be always on and at most have a domain config option. I think a boot
option will never ever be used.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.