RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN

["Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>So, doing some more work there in some cases is probably the 
>>best thing 
>>to do, even though there is natural resistance to adding more code to 
>>the hypervisor.
>
>We all agree to keep HV less code, and we will try to reduce 
>the LOC in next round patch.

BTW, some changes in Xen HV is needed no matter we place #MC to Xen or dom0, 
like ownership CPU check, select most severity CPU, post handler in softIRQ 
etc, which is complex also.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel