[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] HVM pvops failures (one more qemu-dm.strace obtained)
Andrew Lyon wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I fixed error in hvm profile and got a similar qemu-dm.strace ( /usr/lib64/.../qemu-dm). --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] HVM pvops failures To: "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 7:12 PM Ian Jackson wrote:Andrew Lyon writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] HVM guest question (was Re:[PATCH] ioemu: Cleanup the code of PCI passthrough.)"):On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM, IanJackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:These messages are not very surprising. Is it working ?No, when try to start HVM on Xen unstable with pv_ops kernel I getthis error:Ah. This is rather odd. Normally I would hope that xend would report an exit status. (I haven't tried pvops with qemu.)Hm, I'm getting: [2009-02-23 15:26:18 4380] WARNING (image:482) domain win7: device model failure: pid 5409: died due to signal 7; see /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-win7.log Hm, signal 7 - SIGBUS. I wonder if Using stub domains doesn't work either.I would suggest running qemu-dm under strace. This can be done easily enough with a simple wrapper script, something like: #!/bin/sh set -e exec strace -vvs500 -f -o /root/qemu-dm.strace \/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm "$@"and then give the name of the script as device_model in your config file.Is there anything more I can do to help debug this problem? I am eager to do more testing with pv_ops and I have time to do it at the moment, but hvm support is currently broken so there is little I can do with my test box. I was hoping Ian J would pop up and say "Its broken like this! Fix it like this!". There does appear to be some incompatibility between the pvops dom0 and qemu which is causing this SIGBUS; it would be really useful to know what page qemu is trying to access. It might be a problem in the pvops /proc/xen/privcmd implementation, or it could be a bug in qemu which happens to work with 2.6.18. The alternative is to try stubdom, which should avoid the issue. I haven't had much success in making it work, but it looks like I was not starting fs-backend. I'll try again shortly. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |