[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 12/13] Kemari: use signal to save qemu state for Kemari



Keir Fraser wrote:
On 18/03/2009 09:11, "Yoshiaki Tamura" <tamura.yoshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Thanks for measuring the numbers.  It made things clear.
I think we need a signal-based interface as Ian said previously.

On our test environment, AMD Barcelona 2.3GHz, the total cpu cycles of Kemari
in userland when running I/O intensive applications is around 3000000.
Although Xen transferring code and QEMU saving code is processed concurrently,
using xenstored for staring QEMU portion would lower the performance.
Especially if the xenstored gets slower when items are loaded.

Using signals won't work with qemu-dm in a stub domain.

Yes.  I have the following options in my mind to solve it.

1. Switch using signals for qemu-dm in Dom0, and xenstored for stub domains.
2. Prepare a dedicated event channel for saving QEMU state.

I guess using a dedicated event channel would be quicker than xenstored but slower than signals. If it is, using a dedicated event channel for option 1 may be better.

Yoshi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.