Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hmm, in that case it may be more appropriate to modify
> do_suspend_lowlevel().  Have you considered doing that?
>   
do_suspend_lowlevel is in asm with 32 and 64-bit variants, so it is a 
little awkward to deal with.  But, yes, I was thinking of adding a 
do_suspend() with this logic in it, which calls do_suspend_lowlevel() as 
appropriate.
   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel