[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
- To: Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:32:52 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zVJPzE2Wk5PSvtM03K0nttf+JE7YzanXaFfgEcTTP57+S0LDjVcoyBvvgdBWhFuH4cwbvI5DbyGEicMxM2pMD0+wqNLNGEk8ejwDC5maCsBWL2ixXL7BVDnui2OoKL9cQPYCvpFpIu1Zh3jYjGbYHnpQDY1IgCBlz2VKG8GY4AU=;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Please,view dmesg.system and xm dmesg reports for AHCI box.
Kernel has been built via :-
git://git.saout.de/gitweb/linux-dom0-pvops.git
First report contains one stack trace ( exactly as it happened with 2.6.29-tip
on Q9550 ) . I will check it on C2D AHCI box shortly.
Boris.
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
To: "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 12:53 PM
Christophe Saout wrote:
> In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:
>
>
http://git.saout.de/gitweb/?p=linux-dom0-pvops.git;a=summary
>
> It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
> Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
> and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
> It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
> without problems.
>
Does it work with AHCI drives for you? It isn't for me (nor my remerge,
so I'm not sure what has broken in the meantime...).
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
d with 2.6.29-tip
on Q9550 ) .
Boris.
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
To: "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 12:53 PM
Christophe Saout wrote:
> In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:
>
> http://git.saout.de/gitweb/?p=linux-dom0-pvops.git;a=summary
>
> It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
> Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
> and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
> It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
> without problems.
>
Does it work with AHCI drives for you? It isn't for me (nor my remerge,
so I'm not sure what has broken in the meantime...).
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Attachment:
dmesg.system
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
dmesg.xen
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
kernel.config
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
