[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [patch] provide uniqe x2apicid for each vcpu in the cpuid leaf 0xb
Hm, ok, well I think it is a pretty inoffensive patch anyway. I can queue it for post 3.4. - Keir On 07/05/2009 17:48, "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Keir, > It is be used to find out the extended cpu topology of specified in the > leaf 0xb. > > Thanks & Regards, > Nitin > Linux Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > The Mind is like a parachute; it works much better when it's open. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:05 AM >> To: Kamble, Nitin A >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [patch] provide uniqe x2apicid for each vcpu in the cpuid leaf >> 0xb >> >> What's the point of emulating an x2apicid when we don't emulate an x2apic? >> >> -- Keir >> >> On 06/05/2009 23:11, "Nitin A Kamble" <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Keir, >>> >>> Just like the apicid, x2apicid is also unique to each cpu. x2apicid is >>> coming from edx register of the cpuid leaf 0xb. >>> >>> Please Apply/comment. >>> >>> Signed-Off-By: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> >>> diff -r 08618cd10522 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c Mon May 04 14:13:49 2009 -0700 >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c Mon May 04 14:19:05 2009 -0700 >>> @@ -1687,6 +1687,10 @@ >>> *ebx |= (v->vcpu_id * 2) << 24; >>> if ( vlapic_hw_disabled(vcpu_vlapic(v)) ) >>> __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_APIC & 31, edx); >>> + } else if ( input == 0x0000000b ) >>> + { >>> + /* fix the x2apicid */ >>> + *edx = v->vcpu_id * 2; >>> } >>> } >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |