[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] add long interrupt measurement capability


  • To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:14:01 -0400
  • Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 07 May 2009 17:14:31 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qXe8w8qmh9tPkfDoDO5GMwUxTp/xZLrKu7dId7fPvdjiIyaHnBemiZXrYZ+VmyI5Yb swrwUF1houqnmwxl7Lo0TKf1kA9+lti+C6XpfutxdsNIWILOGMdmwP5D71+uUSdzvo1F U0tjhccwBLwxSHbGwCr78WNf2JByc4lDQqEvA=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Dan, Couldn't you add this to xentrace ?

-dulloor

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29/04/2009 17:50, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since I see you are still taking boot-option patches
> for 3.4, I thought I'd retry this one which optionally
> measures cycles spent in each irq.  I thought
> you had just decided it was too late for 3.4... if
> you rejected it for another reason, please let me
> know.

I don't think it has sufficient general utility to be applied. Anyone who
would actually have the want and wit to run this option can apply the patch
themselves.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.