[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 06/16] xen: disable PAT
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 07:14 -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Impact: disable PAT under Xen > > > > Xen imposes a particular PAT layout on all paravirtual guests which > > does not match the layout Linux would like to use. > > > > Force PAT to be disabled until this is resolved. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> > > hm, what will the resolution be? Roughly speaking the kernel needs to cope with different values written to MSR_IA32_CR_PAT than the single hard coded value it would write itself if given the chance. Essentially _PAGE_CACHE_* need to become dynamic (or I guess we could change the native layout to match Xen's, I don't know why native differs from the initial state, I guess just to avoid using the PAT bit for some reason). The various mappings used are: PAT PCD PWT NATIVE XEN BIOS INIT 0 0 0 WB WB WB WB 0 0 1 WC WT WT WT 0 1 0 UC- UC- UC- UC- 0 1 1 UC UC - UC 1 0 0 - WC WB WB 1 0 1 - WP WT WT 1 1 0 - - UC- UC- 1 1 1 - - - UC- (INIT is the processors initial state and BIOS is apparently commonly set by the BIOS). At the time this changeset was originally written using the actual PAT bit (required by Xen's layout to get at WC) led to strange errors (to do with swap masking various bits IIRC) but I believe those have been fixed since by Jan Beulich. I'm not sure how _PAGE_PAT_LARGE fits in -- native cunning avoids having to worry about it by not using the PAT bit at all. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |