[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-users] Re: Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux
- To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:43:11 -0400
- Bcc: tytso@xxxxxxx
- Cc: npiggin@xxxxxxx, ksrinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Spector <stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx>, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:43:20 -0700
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksrinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Spector <stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx>, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxx
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 05:00:21PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> That sound you heard was 10000 xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> all having heart attacks at once.
>
> Need I say more.
So maybe I'm stupid, but why would they be having heart attacks?
It seems like a decent solutoin to me. What's being proposed would
make the dom0/hypervisor interface an internal once, always subject to
change. What's wrong with that? Presumably the domU/hypervisor
interface would have to be remain stable, but why is the
dom0/hypervisor interface have to be sacred and unchanging? I don't
understand the concern.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
