[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC

[Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>]

doesn't XEN support per cpu irq vector?

got sth from XEN 3.3 / SLES 11

igb 0000:81:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 95 (level, low) -> IRQ 95
igb 0000:81:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
igb 0000:81:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection
igb 0000:81:00.0: eth9: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x4) 00:21:28:3a:d8:0e
igb 0000:81:00.0: eth9: PBA No: ffffff-0ff
igb 0000:81:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 4 rx queue(s), 4 tx queue(s)
vendor=8086 device=3420
(XEN) irq.c:847: dom0: invalid pirq 94 or vector -28
igb 0000:81:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 94 (level, low) -> IRQ 94
igb 0000:81:00.1: setting latency timer to 64
(XEN) physdev.c:87: dom0: map irq with wrong vector -28
map irq failed
(XEN) physdev.c:87: dom0: map irq with wrong vector -28
map irq failed

the system need a lot of MSI-X normally.. with current mainline tree
kernel, it will need about 360 irq...

YH

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel