[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix the bug of gdb which debugs xen.
Hello Keir, Having multiple "Waiting for GDB to attach...\n" on single step is too noisy. diff -r 5619bed51ec4 xen/common/gdbstub.c --- a/xen/common/gdbstub.c Fri Aug 14 17:26:23 2009 +0100 +++ b/xen/common/gdbstub.c Fri Aug 14 12:31:42 2009 -0700 @@ -608,9 +608,11 @@ watchdog_disable(); console_start_sync(); +#if 0 /* Shouldn't really do this, but otherwise we stop for no obvious reason, which is Bad */ printk("Waiting for GDB to attach...\n"); +#endif gdb_arch_enter(regs); gdb_ctx->signum = gdb_arch_signal_num(regs, cookie); -caz -----Original Message----- From: Caz Yokoyama [mailto:caz@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:52 PM To: 'Keir Fraser'; 'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix the bug of gdb which debugs xen. Hello Keir, This patch fixes the problem of single step command. In debugger_trap_fatal(), EF_TF bit is turned-on on single step command. Debug trap (single step exception) is not produced when it is off. diff -r da620c454916 xen/arch/x86/traps.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Thu Aug 13 08:40:39 2009 +0100 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Thu Aug 13 20:34:34 2009 -0700 @@ -3014,7 +3014,9 @@ if ( !debugger_trap_fatal(TRAP_debug, regs) ) WARN_ON(1); #endif +#if 0 regs->eflags &= ~EF_TF; +#endif } else { Because EF_TF bit is turned off when not on single step command (i.e. continue command) in debugger_trap_fatal(), just deleting the line is good enough. But I respect your modification. BTW, why you have EF_TF and X86_EFLAGS_TF? Both are same. Is there any reason why you have both? Thank you. -caz -----Original Message----- From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:32 AM To: Caz Yokoyama; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix the bug of gdb which debugs xen. Sorry, my test build worked because I didn't set crash_debug=y. I'll test a fix. -- Keir On 13/08/2009 03:54, "Caz Yokoyama" <cazyokoyama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Keir, > You code does not work. When each byte string is more than 0x7f, sign bit is > extended and produce wrong value. > > diff -r 8a9f81672c76 xen/common/gdbstub.c > --- a/xen/common/gdbstub.c Wed Aug 12 14:27:52 2009 +0100 > +++ b/xen/common/gdbstub.c Wed Aug 12 19:49:12 2009 -0700 > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ > return -1; > } > > -char > +unsigned char > str2hex(const char *str) > { > return (char2hex(str[0]) << 4) | char2hex(str[1]); > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ > x <<= 8; > x += str2hex(*str); > #elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) > - x += (unsigned long)str2hex(*str) << (i*8); > + x += (unsigned long)str2hex(str) << (i*8); > #else > # error unknown endian > #endif > diff -r 8a9f81672c76 xen/include/xen/gdbstub.h > --- a/xen/include/xen/gdbstub.h Wed Aug 12 14:27:52 2009 +0100 > +++ b/xen/include/xen/gdbstub.h Wed Aug 12 19:49:12 2009 -0700 > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ > /* value <-> char (de)serialzers for arch specific gdb backends */ > char hex2char(unsigned long x); > int char2hex(unsigned char c); > -char str2hex(const char *str); > +unsigned char str2hex(const char *str); > unsigned long str2ulong(const char *str, unsigned long bytes); > > struct gdb_context { > -caz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Caz Yokoyama [mailto:caz@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:03 PM > To: 'Keir Fraser'; 'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix the bug of gdb which debugs xen. > > Probably, you mean. > > diff -r 8a9f81672c76 xen/common/gdbstub.c > --- a/xen/common/gdbstub.c Wed Aug 12 14:27:52 2009 +0100 > +++ b/xen/common/gdbstub.c Wed Aug 12 14:00:20 2009 -0700 > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ > x <<= 8; > x += str2hex(*str); > #elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) > - x += (unsigned long)str2hex(*str) << (i*8); > + x += (unsigned long)str2hex(str) << (i*8); > #else > # error unknown endian > #endif > -caz > -----Original Message----- > From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:30 AM > To: Caz Yokoyama; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix the bug of gdb which debugs xen. > > I rewrote it some more. Take a look at changeset 20054. > > -- Keir > > On 12/08/2009 13:52, "Caz Yokoyama" <cazyokoyama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hello Keir, >> You are right and good points. Thank you. I did not aware them because > only >> environment I test is x86_64. How about this? I am glad if you check in. I >> regularly update my local source code by "hg pull; hg up". >> -caz >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:58 AM >> To: Caz Yokoyama; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix the bug of gdb which debugs xen. >> >> I don't know whether you intend this for immediate checkin, but anyway: >> >> * Don't delete the sysenter logic in traps.c, leave it. >> * I'm not sure about swap64() in gdbstub.c. The value may not be 64 bits >> (e.g., running on i386), or the system may not be little endian. Might be >> better to define an alternative to str2ulong() which is endian aware, like >> gdb_write_to_packet_hex(). >> >> -- Keir >> >> On 12/08/2009 03:15, "Caz Yokoyama" <cazyokoyama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> This patch fixes the bug of gdb which debugs Xen hypervisor, i.e. not >> domU. As >>> Emre Can Sezer reported in >>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-01/msg00885.html, >> once >>> break point is hit, continue command produces SIGTRAP at >> restore_all_xen(). >>> This patch makes continue command resume Xen running. I still see other >> bugs >>> like backtrace command does not show function name. But I hope this helps >> your >>> debug. >>> FYI, related postings. >>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-12/msg00678.html >>> >> > http://www.filewatcher.com/p/xen_2.0.6.orig.tar.gz.2456215/xen-2.0/docs/misc >> /X >>> enDebugger-HOWTO.html >>> >>> connect gdb on step command >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Thu Aug 06 13:27:53 2009 +0100 >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Tue Aug 11 18:15:25 2009 -0700 >>> @@ -2977,13 +2977,7 @@ >>> if ( regs->eflags & EF_TF ) >>> { >>> #ifdef __x86_64__ >>> - void sysenter_entry(void); >>> - void sysenter_eflags_saved(void); >>> - /* In SYSENTER entry path we can't zap TF until EFLAGS is >> saved. >>> */ >>> - if ( (regs->rip >= (unsigned long)sysenter_entry) && >>> - (regs->rip < (unsigned long)sysenter_eflags_saved) ) >>> - goto out; >>> - WARN_ON(regs->rip != (unsigned long)sysenter_eflags_saved); >>> + debugger_trap_fatal(TRAP_debug, regs); >>> #else >>> WARN_ON(1); >>> #endif >>> >>> Value of gdb command is little endian. >>> diff -r 13fe7f07df15 xen/common/gdbstub.c >>> --- a/xen/common/gdbstub.c Thu Aug 06 13:27:53 2009 +0100 >>> +++ b/xen/common/gdbstub.c Tue Aug 11 18:15:25 2009 -0700 >>> @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ >>> >>> #define GDB_RETRY_MAX 10 >>> >>> +#define swap16(_v) ((((u16)(_v)>>8)&0xff)|(((u16)(_v)&0xff)<<8)) >>> +#define swap32(_v) >>> (((u32)swap16((u16)(_v))<<16)|(u32)swap16((u32)((_v)>>16))) >>> +#define swap64(_v) >>> (((u64)swap32((u32)(_v))<<32)|(u64)swap32((u32)((_v)>>32))) >>> + >>> struct gdb_cpu_info >>> { >>> atomic_t paused; >>> @@ -489,6 +493,7 @@ >>> } >>> ptr++; >>> val = str2ulong(ptr, sizeof(unsigned long)); >>> + val = swap64(val); >>> gdb_arch_write_reg(addr, val, regs, ctx); >>> break; >>> case 'D': >>> >>> Thank you. >>> -Caz Yokoyama, caz at caztech dot com. 503-804-1028(m). >>> >>> >> > Attachment:
QuietGdb.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |