[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] rdtsc emulation (PV and HVM) must be monotonically increasing
The Intel SDM (section 18.10) clearly states that rdtsc returns a "monotonically increasing unique value". Current emulation code for rdtsc (both PV and HVM) returns only a monotonically-non-decreasing (non-unique) value, so ensure stale value is always incremented. Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> diff -r 8fc927798476 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c Tue Sep 01 11:36:51 2009 +0100 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c Tue Sep 01 16:53:42 2009 -0600 @@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ u64 hvm_get_guest_time(struct vcpu *v) spin_lock(&pl->pl_time_lock); now = get_s_time() + pl->stime_offset; - if ( (int64_t)(now - pl->last_guest_time) >= 0 ) + if ( (int64_t)(now - pl->last_guest_time) > 0 ) pl->last_guest_time = now; else - now = pl->last_guest_time; + now = ++pl->last_guest_time; spin_unlock(&pl->pl_time_lock); return now + v->arch.hvm_vcpu.stime_offset; diff -r 8fc927798476 xen/arch/x86/time.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c Tue Sep 01 11:36:51 2009 +0100 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c Tue Sep 01 16:53:42 2009 -0600 @@ -1454,10 +1454,10 @@ void pv_soft_rdtsc(struct vcpu *v, struc rdtsc_usercount++; spin_lock(&v->domain->arch.vtsc_lock); now = get_s_time() + v->domain->arch.vtsc_stime_offset; - if ( (int64_t)(now - v->domain->arch.vtsc_last) >= 0 ) + if ( (int64_t)(now - v->domain->arch.vtsc_last) > 0 ) v->domain->arch.vtsc_last = now; else - now = v->domain->arch.vtsc_last; + now = ++v->domain->arch.vtsc_last; spin_unlock(&v->domain->arch.vtsc_lock); regs->eax = (uint32_t)now; regs->edx = (uint32_t)(now >> 32); Attachment:
vtsc-mono.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |