Re: [Xen-devel] Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:55:34AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> >I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that 2.6.31-rc8
> >boots without the stack-trace failure? Can you attach the dmesg please
> >and also 'lspci -vvv' output?
> 
> If i built rc8 on F11 ( dual booting) with F12 and install kernel and modules 
> via
> 
> # mount /dev/mapper/serverfedora11-lv_root /mnt
> #cd  /mnt/usr/src/linux-2.6-xen
> # make modules_install install
> 
> in F12 env, then  i get a stable kernel rc8 on F12.

You contradict yourself latter where you say that the 2.6.31-rc8 built
on F12 and installed on F12 has a stack-trace. Or am I misreading it?

> 
>   If i compile and and install on F12 kernel has stack trace and is pretty 
> unstable at
> runtime. 

Is the kernel you build on F11 (that being called ServerXen35), with
and without Xen producing the same dmesg? That being a dmesg that
did not have a stack trace.

> 
> Now i am  sending  two  dmesg reports :-
> 1. Kernel 2.6.31-rc8 been built on F11 and installed on F12 
> dmesg.log.gz  (clean)

>  2. Kernel 2.6.31-rc8 been built on F12 and installed on F12 
> dmesg.1.gz ( stack trace here) 
> "lspci -vvv"  report has been also sent to you per your request, but i will 
> repeat. This one is for C2D   E8400   box.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel