Re: [Xen-devel] sparse M2P table

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/09/2009 15:04, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Does that sound good?
> 
> Indeed, it doesn't really matter *what* gets mapped there. I wouldn't,
> however, strictly stick to the first chunk - if there's a 1G chunk, and later
> a 1G hole, I'd prefer using the existing 1G chunk there, and iteratively
> populate it with 2M chunks only when no 1G chunk was previously
> allocated. Perhaps (depending on what turns out simpler) I might also
> just use the most recent chunk for sticking in a hole...

Sounds fine to me.

 K.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel