[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: Fedora 11 PV Xen domU (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64) crash with invalid opcode in xsave_cntxt_init (xsetbv)
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:44:44PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:29:21PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > On 09/21/09 12:57, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > Hello Jeremy and others, > > > > > > I friend of mine is trying to install x86_64 Fedora 11 Xen PV domU on > > > CentOS 5.4 x86_64 dom0. He's getting a kernel crash.. so I was wondering > > > if you've seen this one before. > > > > > > A couple of kernel boot/crash logs: > > > http://v6.fi/misc/f11_64_kernel.debug2.txt > > > http://v6.fi/misc/f11_64_kernel.debug4.txt > > > > > > (early) Kernel command line: root=/dex/xvda1 ro earlyprintk=xen > > > (early) Initializing CPU#0 > > > (early) invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] (early) SMP (early) > > > (early) last sysfs file: > > > (early) CPU 0 (early) > > > (early) Modules linked in:(early) > > > (early) Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 #1 > > > (early) RIP: e030:[<ffffffff81397963>] (early) [<ffffffff81397963>] > > > xsave_cntxt_init+0xba/0x199 > > > > > > > This looks like the bug where Xen doesn't filter out the xsave feature > > flag and the kernel tries to use it, fixed in change ef7616ff29ad. > > Kernel change e826fe1ba15 works around the Xen bug by doing its own > > masking (I think it got into 2.6.30). > > > > There's also a "noxsave" kernel parameter, but that may have been added > > after 2.6.29. > > > > Thanks for the fast reply. I'll ask him to try "noxsave". > It seems "noxsave" kernel parameter was added in Linux 2.6.30, so that doesn't help for 2.6.29. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |