[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] use "reliable" tsc properly when available, but verify


  • To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:01:27 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:02:02 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcpAeQr2vU5z3PLHS7SvQkhD0izWqQABc0xb
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] use "reliable" tsc properly when available, but verify

On 28/09/2009 21:19, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So we trust but verify... if the cpuid bit is set
> we assume a reliable tsc, but use the Linux boottime
> check_tsc_warp algorithm to periodically verify that
> the tsc hasn't skewed.  If it has, we fall back to Xen
> managing (and periodically writing) the TSC.
> 
> The check_tsc_warp algorithm is CPU-intensive, so
> we test it on a decaying schedule, at 1sec, 2sec,
> 4sec, 8sec, 16sec, 32sec, etc.

Surely it should be sufficient to check TSCs for consistency across all CPUs
periodically, and against the chosen platform timer, and ensure none are
drifting? An operation which would not require us to loop for 2ms and would
provide rather more useful information than an ad-hoc multi-CPU
race-to-update-a-shared-variable-an-arbitrary-and-large-number-of-times.

I wouldn't take anything like this algorithm.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.