[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen


  • To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:20:50 +0200
  • Cc: "Fajar A." <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:21:32 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bvOuW8jz8XvbTRMXZR45BCJlqAlCnjJNyzzEq0iSAPnLbeCj8DjkKtdFsnTvLe7AyQ PmFFNeKH+R0LZN7MJSObxlshx79Oflaqtf4XRnmB606jAprIfM1X+Z72isSRJF8K1KwZ 1UayNnp7gDv2fJytAXWVsCbAc8s0aWvrgAnrc=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/01/09 14:55, Marco Tizzoni wrote:
>> Sorry, I was not clear. It works as I expect, i.e going not over 1000
>> hz (my dom0 kernel has been compiled with 1000hz).
>>
>
> OK, that's definitely *not* expected.  If you're running with
> CONFIG_NO_HZ and HIGH_RES_TIMERS then timer resolution should have
> nothing to do with your HZ configuration.

> 100kHz is also very demanding.
> How does it work with 2kHz? 10kHz?

hal9k-dom0 ~ # ./testtimer .0001 |head -n10
1000 iterations at  0.000100 sec
0.000051
0.000885
0.000890
0.000892
0.000891
0.000892
0.000893
0.000893
0.000879
0.000893
hal9k-dom0 ~ # ./testtimer .002 |head -n10
1000 iterations at  0.002000 sec
0.000744
0.000978
0.000990
0.000990
0.000990
0.000991
0.000992
0.000991
0.000992
0.000990


m-

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.