Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 12] backport critical fixes from qemu upstream

[Florian Manschwetus <florianmanschwetus@xxxxxx>]

Am 09.10.2009 15:58, schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Mark Johnson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 12] backport critical fixes 
> from qemu upstream"):
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Stefano Stabellini
>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The same should be done to qemu-xen-3.4-testing as well.
>>> Cheers,
>>
>> Are you planning to push these to qemu-xen-3.4-testing  soon too?
> 
> Yes, but I'm giving it a few days to settle down in qemu-xen-unstable
> first, as that seemed sensible ...
> 
> Ian.
Ok, but how much are a few days?

This,
2106 xvm         3  59    0 5700M 3743M sleep  758:48  0.28% qemu-dm

is quite a real showstopper and a big pain in my...

So, sorry but this fix is really a critical one.

Florian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel