[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] pv 2.6.31 (kernel.org) and save/migrate, domU BUG()
> > Ok, so it appears there is something problematic with > > saving an upstream kernel. It might be (partially) fixed > > in Fedora 12 or maybe there is some other environmental > > difference which makes save fail entirely on my system. > > > > Yeah, fedora kernel has some patches, but it should be pretty > close to upstream kernel.. > > btw was your guest UP or SMP? Mine was UP.. Mine was SMP... switching to UP I can now save. BUT... restore doesn't seem to quite work. The restore completes but I get no response from the VNC console. When I use a tty console, after restore, I am getting an infinite dump of WARNING: at arch/x86/time.c:180 xen_sched_clock+0x2b (see attached). Did you try restore on Fedora 12? > > > > The results explain why I can get it to run on > > > > one machine (an older laptop) and not run on another > > > > machine (a Nehalem system)... looks like this is maybe > > > > related to the cpuid-extended-topology-leaf bug that Jeremy > > > > sent a fix for upstream recently. > > > > > > Did you try with that patch applied? > > > > No, the patch wasn't posted, just a pull request to Linus, > > so I don't have the patch (and am not a git expert so > > am not sure how to get it). > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-11/msg00182.html > > > > So I'll try it again when .6 or .7 is available. > > See here for changelog: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=bugfix > > You can get the diffs/patches from there using the links.. Thanks. Yes, Jeremy's patch allows 2.6.31.5 (in a PV domain) to completely boot on my Nehalem box. Attachment:
restore.out _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |