[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Question: dom0 electrocuted by implicitly unmapped grantrefs


  • To: Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:01:42 +0000
  • Cc: Xen Developers <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:02:09 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcptPE7hTL+DEjNjQBCmjwdI/x9TbwABKH9O
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Question: dom0 electrocuted by implicitly unmapped grantrefs

On 24/11/2009 19:28, "Daniel Stodden" <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The domain struct would stay around until all pages have been released,
> right? Certainly the ld crash is due to what remains to be filed as a
> bug in ld.
> 
> But killing the host? Until then it was a resource leak and a zombie
> domain, bad enough to not let the issue go unnoticed.

Where does 'killing the host' come from? The host won't be killed. Well,
unless dom0 is the offending domain. Bad dom0. :-)

Well, I don't really care about this very much. We can replace with a
gdprintk() and not crash the domain, just as well.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.