[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework
> > I don't particularly object to xenbus_walk per-se, its just that I don't > think xen_create_msi_irq() should call it directly. It would be OK for > xen_setup_msi_irqs() to call it and pass the results into > xen_create_msi_irq(). > > Would a registration list be any cleaner? Presumably you'd just keep a > list of devices being controlled by other domains, so non-presence on > the list means DOMID_SELF, so you'd only need to worry about > registration on pciback paths. If that could be done without needing to > touch common code (or do the horrible hacks that some of the earlier MSI > patches did), then maybe its worthwhile. I think that would work nicely. Should have a patch cooked up shortly after I am done with the xen-fbfront drier in DomU. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |