Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] cleanup for __start_xen()

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/12/2009 09:42, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 01:16 +0000 on 01 Dec (1259630197), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> e is moved in [e-(modules_length+modules_headroom), e] range,
>> so, s is not overrun e too...
> 
> OK, but:
>  - this is not obvious (hence this thread);
>  - even Keir makes mistakes here from time to time; and
>  - it's a single test on code that runs at start of day
> so maybe we should just leave it as it was?

I'll put it back and fix my other pre-existing mistake also.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel