[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]x86: add a range for hpet broadcast
Thanks. Also, beyond a certain point, you have to consider whether just setting timer_slop=2ms (or whatever) has similar effect on performance and power saving, with no code modifications. :-) It's not like slop=1ms is some super-special value or anything, arrived at with scientific exactitude. But the approach I suggect at least seems internally consistent and I will considewr it if it gives you similar power wins to what your original patch gave you. -- Keir On 09/12/2009 12:34, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On a Xeon 5500 server w/ 2S/8C/16T, w/ HT off, starting 8 rhel5 UP hvm guests, > idling, I saw 22W (10%) power saving after apply this patch and specify > timer_slop=1ms on xen grub line. It saves 10W more than the case only specify > timer_slop=1ms but w\o this patch. > > Yes, your suggestion do remove the double dipping. I will give it a try. > > Jimmy > > Keir Fraser wrote: >> How much of a win is this? The per-cpu timer_deadline is already >> calculated based on slop, so doing it again in hpet.c is kind of like >> double dipping. I think we can validly do some improvements in hpet.c >> however: e.g., by exposing a per-cpu timer deadline range >> (deadline_start,deadline_end) and setting up HPET to fire on the >> earliest deadline_end. Then broadcast to all CPUs with deadline_start >> < NOW() when the HPET fires. >> >> The deadline range would be computed as follows in timer.c, in the >> !ts->overflow case in the softirq handler: >> timer_deadline_start = start (i.e., same as timer_deadline today) >> timer_deadline_end = end >> In the (incredibly uncommon) ts->overflow case we can just set >> timer_deadline_start=timer_deadline_end=timer_deadline. >> >> Perhaps give that a go: I would find that more acceptable at least, >> but all of this really depends on what benchmark improvements you are >> seeing. >> >> -- Keir >> >> On 09/12/2009 09:33, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> x86: add a range for hpet broadcast >>> >>> Apply a range timer like range to hpet broadcast, so that timer >>> expires within timer_slop ns across idle CPUs are capable to be >>> aligned to reduce hpet intrs, and save idle power. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |