[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xen_tlb_flush_all mfn validation panic
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 16:01 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 24/12/2009 15:32, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 24/12/2009 15:06, "Kieran Mansley" <kmansley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> The initial "bad gmfn" message seems to be due to an attempt to validate > >> the mfn argument to the mmuext_op. It's not surprising to me that this > >> fails as xen_tlb_flush_all doesn't supply an mfn argument - it's not > >> needed for the MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_ALL command. Is there something that is > >> supposed to mean that the mfn argument should be valid even when not > >> explicitly set by the caller, or is the validation of the mfn for all > >> mmuext_op commands a bug? > > > > The explicit check for INVALID_MFN is new, and that is obviously a bug. I > > will sort out a suitable fix for this. > > Should be fixed by c/s 20723. Great, thanks. I'll retest after Christmas. Kieran _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |