[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate



hg export 20762 | patch -Rp1
hg export 20767 | patch -Rp1
...then rebuild and reinstall Xen and dom0 tools.
Afterwards, to revert the above:
hg diff | patch -Rp1

 -- Keir

On 12/01/2010 18:34, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry, i need an exact commands to revert to two CSs.
> Googling doesn't help for sure. Otherwise , it doesn't make sense.
> 
> Boris.
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 11:59 AM
>> 
>> Hm, nothing recent looks especially likely to cause this. Maybe c/s 20767,
>> if the format string it modifies is still incorrect after the change. It
>> might be interesting to revert 20767 and 20762 and see if the problem still
>> occurs.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
>> 
>> On 12/01/2010 15:50, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>> 
>>> I did clone of xen-unstable.hg about 10-12 days ago on the same box and it
>>> worked. That's one of the recent CSs.
>>> 
>>> Boris.
>>> 
>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "
>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 10:29 AM
>>>> 
>>>> Any idea when this last worked in xen-unstable?
>>>> 
>>>>  -- Keir
>>>> 
>>>> On 12/01/2010 15:18, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Attempt to load Xen 4.0-rc1 with 2..6.31.6 pvops kernel on top of Ubuntu
>>>>> 9.04
>>>>> server. ( Xen 3.4.3-rc1-pre loads fine with any kernel) :-
>>>>> dmesg :-
>>>>> 
>>>>> . . . . . . . .
>>>>> 
>>>>> [  499.890371] xend[1609]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895af sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  499.905480] xend[1612]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  499.934416] xend[1620]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  499.949121] xend[1623]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  499.988220] xend[1633]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  500.013995] xend[1641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  500.053252] xend[1652]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  500.069849] xend[1657]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  500.085520] xend[1660]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.907064] __ratelimit: 205 callbacks suppressed
>>>>> [  504.907070] xend[2628]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.922303] xend[2631]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.937531] xend[2634]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.952277] xend[2638]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.966630] xend[2641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.981380] xend[2644]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  504.996759] xend[2647]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  505..012018] xend[2650]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9..so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  505.026693] xend[2653]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [  505.041834] xend[2656]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Boris.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>>>> To: "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > "
>>>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:38 AM
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel
>>>>>> includes
>>>>>> dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or
>>>>>> Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by
>>>>>> default
>>>>>> by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that
>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> mean you *have* to use it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel version
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> version support?
>>>>>>> Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub the
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> version from Jeremy branches?
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default with
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
>>>>>>> But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a
>>>>>>> dom0
>>>>>>> support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> mainline?
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have Xen
>>>>>>> Dom0
>>>>>>> support in the kernel mainline. see more here:
>>>>>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
>>>>>>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen..devel/75992>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open source
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> amazing virtualization system.
>>>>>>> Sassy 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and
>>>>>>>> published.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You can grab it from here:
>>>>>>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1')
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please test it!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
>  



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.