[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Failed to create a domain with xen-unstable (Error 22: Invalid argument)


  • To: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:40:51 +0900
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:41:31 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=TMMMPO0Iu8f5qE9sZyuXqnIk60st0HUYnOMGrxYiQcJ55vvDe5nZW2PwxWkeqpfw8o LDkjoFc8ZipSjA4QYYfv67L4oU8NqrRoyYVl4T659kIXDRTWx74VyIA42lrt8AQpJ3g7 Oqnvqxctis5+0SncobTQb5oe21NqjWoXaVH0g=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Xu, Dongxiao <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, one VM could own maxium 128 vcpus.
> The failure you meet should be a regression. I am looking into it.

Thanks! Let me know if you need more information.

Anyway, I am wondering how a simple bug like this can evade the
auto-testing process??

Jun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.