[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/2] Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from \_PR to \_SB


  • To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:29:20 +0000
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:29:49 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcqrQRdRK42tFnx6Rbij20ZBPcBQRQACAINSAA4+mEAADuDBxwAARQvQAAHaQXoAAJD/wAAAjkyDAAAepVAAAMwzww==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/2] Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from \_PR to \_SB

On 12/02/2010 10:07, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Win2k8 has a similar problem?
>> 
>>  -- Keir
> 
> Yes. Yunhong test Win2k8, and found in Win2k8 data center version, cpu hotplug
> successed for _SB definition, but failed for _PR definition. (success mean,
> after we hot-add vcpu, the device manager will shown new processor, but the
> task manager has no changes, same as
> http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2009/05/10/vsphere-memory-hot-add-cpu-hot-
> plug/ .Fail mean even the device manager has no changes).

Okay, how about the attached alternative patch then? Smaller than yours but
hoepfully equivalent. It doesn't include your change to the _STA method to
return 0 instead of 9 in the offline case however -- there was no
explanation for that in the changeset comment?

 -- Keir

Attachment: 00-dsdt
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.