Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] to fix ACPI slit table access at runtime

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25/02/2010 13:03, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Removing the code for 32-bit altogether is certainly one option (in
> that case I'd want to see _memnodemap to be reasonably
> increased though, plus we should probably make an attempt to
> reduce memnodemapsize again - the hash shift currently is unduly
> small - and I have a patch for the original Linux code to do so).
> 
> All other options are likely indeed not worth it to make 32-bit
> happy.

Given we agree the current situation is a bug, could you make up a patch
along the lines of what you prefer to see? Because my default action will be
simply to ifdef the code, as NUMA-on-i386 is not much a concern of mine.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel