[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Intel: Overly restrictive test for availablility of CPUID masking MSRs?



Hi,

http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/aab9fbd6ffa0 from
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-07/msg00518.html
restricts the CPUID masking feature to model 0x1d or model 0x17 with
stepping >=4:
        if (!((model == 0x1d) || ((model == 0x17) && ((eax & 0xf) >=
        4)))) {
                /* fail ... */
        
A Xeon E5520 which is supposed to have FlexMigration has family 6, model
26 (0x1a) and stepping 5 fails the existing test and we think it should
be allowed.

Is there a more precise way of detecting the presence of this
capability? I've seen:
        family > 0x6 || (model > 0x17 || (model = 0x17 && stepping >= 4))
suggested but this looks like it matches exactly the same set of
processors as the "eax < 0x00010674" in the code before aab9fbd6ffa0
which was apparently too lenient?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.