[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: set_msi_affinity() vs. pci_restore_msi_state()
>>> "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> 08.03.10 03:14 >>> >Jan, > Have you met any issue ? Yes, but not in the resume code path. Instead, I got a log including output from the new 'M' debug key, which showed that entry->msg.data must have been all zero. That lead me to look at the code paths where this field would get written. >Per my understanding, there is no problem here. For set_msi_affinity, >it calls write_msi_msg to write the MSI info to real hardware and also update it to (msi_desc)entry->msg, so entry->msg should store the >latest msi's data/addr. Oh, right, I overlooked write_msi_msg() writing entry->msg - mislead by the fact that it may be called with &entry->msg (which makes the - in this case unnecessary - assignment sort of unexpected. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |