[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/7] xen: Enable event channel of PV extension of HVM
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 06:16:30 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 03/04/2010 10:07 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > > We mapped each IOAPIC pin to a VIRQ, so that we can deliver interrupt > > through these VIRQs. > > > > We used X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR as the notification vector for hypervisor > > to notify guest about the event. > > > > The patch also enabled SMP support, then we can support IPI through > > evtchn as well. > > > > When this feature is enabled, we would relay on Xen PV timer for > > clockevent, rather than other hardware emulated ones. > > > > Then we don't use IOAPIC/LAPIC, eliminated the overhead brought by > > unnecessary VMExit caused by LAPIC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang<sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 6 ++-- > > arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/xen/irq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 76 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h | > > 16 +++++++++ > > drivers/xen/events.c | 74 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/xen/events.h | > > 4 ++ > > include/xen/hvm.h | 5 +++ > > include/xen/interface/xen.h | 6 +++- > > 9 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > > index 36daccb..2d60e70 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > > @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static u32 xen_safe_apic_wait_icr_idle(void) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static void set_xen_basic_apic_ops(void) > > +void xen_set_basic_apic_ops(void) > > { > > apic->read = xen_apic_read; > > apic->write = xen_apic_write; > > @@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ static void xen_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs > > *regs) xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_crash); > > } > > > > -static const struct machine_ops __initdata xen_machine_ops = { > > +const struct machine_ops __initdata xen_machine_ops = { > > .restart = xen_restart, > > .halt = xen_machine_halt, > > .power_off = xen_machine_halt, > > @@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void) > > /* > > * set up the basic apic ops. > > */ > > - set_xen_basic_apic_ops(); > > + xen_set_basic_apic_ops(); > > #endif > > > > if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_mmu_pt_update_preserve_ad)) { > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c b/arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c > > index 305dcca..673b036 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > > #include<xen/interface/version.h> > > #include<xen/interface/memory.h> > > > > +#include<asm/reboot.h> > > #include<asm/xen/cpuid.h> > > #include<asm/xen/hypercall.h> > > #include<asm/xen/hypervisor.h> > > @@ -44,6 +45,8 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_pv_banner(void) > > printk(KERN_INFO "Xen version: %d.%d%s\n", > > version>> 16, version& 0xffff, extra.extraversion); > > printk(KERN_INFO "PV feature: PV clocksource enabled\n"); > > + if (xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_enabled()) > > + printk(KERN_INFO "PV feature: Event channel enabled\n"); > > } > > > > static int __init xen_para_available(void) > > @@ -83,6 +86,9 @@ static int __init init_hvm_pv_info(void) > > if (!(edx& XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV)) > > return -ENODEV; > > > > + if (edx& XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV_EVTCHN) > > + xen_hvm_pv_features |= XEN_HVM_PV_EVTCHN_ENABLED; > > + > > if (pages< 1) > > return -ENODEV; > > > > @@ -127,9 +133,35 @@ static void __init init_pv_clocksource(void) > > xen_register_clocksource(); > > } > > > > +static int set_callback_via(uint64_t via) > > +{ > > + struct xen_hvm_param a; > > + > > + a.domid = DOMID_SELF; > > + a.index = HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ; > > + a.value = via; > > + return HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_set_param,&a); > > +} > > + > > +void do_hvm_pv_evtchn_intr(void) > > +{ > > + per_cpu(irq_count, smp_processor_id())++; > > + xen_hvm_evtchn_do_upcall(get_irq_regs()); > > + per_cpu(irq_count, smp_processor_id())--; > > +} > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC > > +static void xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_apic_write(u32 reg, u32 val) > > +{ > > + /* The only one reached here should be EOI */ > > + WARN_ON(reg != APIC_EOI); > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > void __init xen_guest_init(void) > > { > > int r; > > + uint64_t callback_via; > > > > /* Ensure the we won't confused with others */ > > if (xen_domain()) > > @@ -152,4 +184,31 @@ void __init xen_guest_init(void) > > init_pv_clocksource(); > > > > xen_domain_type = XEN_HVM_DOMAIN; > > + > > + if (xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_enabled()) { > > + xen_hvm_pv_init_irq_ops(); > > + > > + x86_init.timers.timer_init = xen_time_init; > > + x86_init.timers.setup_percpu_clockev = x86_init_noop; > > + x86_cpuinit.setup_percpu_clockev = x86_init_noop; > > + > > + pv_apic_ops.startup_ipi_hook = paravirt_nop; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC > > + /* > > + * set up the basic apic ops. > > + */ > > + xen_set_basic_apic_ops(); > > + apic->write = xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_apic_write; > > +#endif > > + > > + callback_via = HVM_CALLBACK_VECTOR(X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR); > > + set_callback_via(callback_via); > > + > > + x86_platform_ipi_callback = do_hvm_pv_evtchn_intr; > > + > > + disable_acpi(); > > + > > + xen_hvm_pv_smp_init(); > > + machine_ops = xen_machine_ops; > > + } > > } > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/irq.c b/arch/x86/xen/irq.c > > index 9d30105..e325640 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/irq.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/irq.c > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > > > > #include<asm/x86_init.h> > > > > +#include<xen/xen.h> > > #include<xen/interface/xen.h> > > #include<xen/interface/sched.h> > > #include<xen/interface/vcpu.h> > > @@ -131,3 +132,30 @@ void __init xen_init_irq_ops() > > pv_irq_ops = xen_irq_ops; > > x86_init.irqs.intr_init = xen_init_IRQ; > > } > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_HVM_PV > > +static void xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_disable(void) > > +{ > > + native_irq_disable(); > > + xen_irq_disable(); > > +} > > +PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_disable); > > + > > +static void xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_enable(void) > > +{ > > + native_irq_enable(); > > + xen_irq_enable(); > > +} > > Why is it necessary to disable both the event mask and eflags.IF? > Surely IF is enough? > > If it is necessary here, why not for save/restore flags? Yes, you are right. IF should be enough. Update this patch alone, or whole series again? (notice you were replying to the old version...) -- regards Yang, Sheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |