Re: [Xen-devel] [Solved] Nouveau on dom0

[Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:26:12AM +0530, Arvind R wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:16:13PM +0530, Arvind R wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >>>> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 02:47:58PM +0530, Arvind R wrote:
>> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >>>> >> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >>> (FYI, look at
>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git;a=commit;h=e84db8b7136d1b4a393dbd982201d0c5a3794333)
>>
>> THAT SOLVED THE FAULTING; OUT_RING now completes under Xen.
>
> That is great! Thanks for doing all the hard-work in digging through the
> code.
>
>
> So this means you got graphics on the screen? Or at least that Kernel
> Mode Setting and the DRM parts show fancy graphics during boot?

AT LAST, yes! Patch: (after aboout 600 reboots!)

diff -Naur nouveau-kernel.orig/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
nouveau-kernel.new/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
--- nouveau-kernel.orig/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c 2010-01-27
10:19:28.000000000 +0530
+++ nouveau-kernel.new/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c  2010-03-10
17:28:59.000000000 +0530
@@ -271,7 +271,10 @@
         */

        vma->vm_private_data = bo;
-       vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED | VM_IO | VM_MIXEDMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND;
+       vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED | VM_MIXEDMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND;
+       if (!((bo->mem.placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM) & TTM_PL_FLAG_TT))
+               vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO;
+       vma->vm_page_prot = vma_get_vm_prot(vma->vm_flags);
        return 0;
 out_unref:
        ttm_bo_unref(&bo);

The previous patch worked for memory-space exported to user via
mmap. That worked for the pushbuf, but not for mode-setting (I guess).
The ensuing crashes were hard - no logs, nothing. So had to devise
ways of forcing log-writing before crashing (and praying). The located
iomem problem and had search code for appropriate condition.
And setting the vm_page_prot IS important!

Nouveau does kernel-modesetting only. The framebuffer device uses
channel 1 and is as regular a framebuffer as any other. 2D graphics
operations use channel 2 (xf86-video-nouveau). 3D graphics (gallium)
use a channel for every 3D window. There are 128 channels, 0 and 127
being reserved. Every channel has a dma-engine which is user triggered
thro' pushbuffer rings. Every DMA has a 1MiB VRAM space which forms one
of the targets of DMA ops - the other being in the opaque GPU-space. The
BO encapsualtes the virtual-address space of the user VM. and the GPU-DMA
is provided a constructed PageTable that is consistent with the kernel view of
that space. The GEM_NEW ioctl sets up the whole space-management machinery,
the user-space is mmaped out, and the operations triggered thro the pushbuf.

> But to answer your question, the DMA address is actually the MFN
> (machine frame number) which is bitshifted by twelve and an offset
> added. The debug patch I provided gets that from the
>
> PTE value:
>
>        if (xen_domain()) {
> +               phys = (pte_mfn(*pte) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
>
> The 'phys' now has the physical address that PCI bus (and the video
> card) would utilize to request data to. Please keep in mind that the
> 'pte_mfn' is a special Xen function. Normally one would do 'pte'.
>
> There is a layer of indirection in the Linux pvops kernel that makes
> this a bit funny. Mainly most of the time you get something called GPFN
> which is a psedu-physical MFN. Then there is a translation of PFN to
> MFN (or vice-versa). For pages that are being utilized for PCI devices
> (and that have _PAGE_IOMAP PTE flag set), the GPFN is actually the MFN,
> while for the rest (like the pages allocated by the mmap and then
> stitched up in the ttm_bo_fault handler), it is the PFN.
>
> .. back to the DMA part. When kernel subsystems do DMA they go through a
> PCI DMA API. This API has things such as 'dma_map_page', which through
> layers of indirection calls the Xen SWIOTLB layer. The Xen SWIOTLB is
> smart enough (actually, the enligthen.c) to distinguish if the page has
> _PAGE_IOMAP set or not and to figure out if the PTE has a MFN or PFN.
>
> Hopefully I've not confused this matter :-(
On the contrary, a neat essence of the matter - only wish it was clear to me
a month ago:-(

YAHOO! (just a simple shout)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel