Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking

[Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 06:56 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 15:03 +0800, Weidong Han wrote:
> > Can you post your Xen boot logs?

I'm not sure what you're looking for in a boot log, I think I've pretty
well described the problem.  Here's the relevant output:

(XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 8, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
(XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec08000, GSI 24-47
(XEN) IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 10, version 32, address 0xfec10000, GSI 48-71
(XEN) Enabling APIC mode:  Phys.  Using 3 I/O APICs
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:421:   Non-existent device (84:13.0) is reported in this 
DRHD's scope!
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:443:   The DRHD is invalid due to there are devices under 
its scope are not PCI discoverable! Pls try option iommu=force or 
iommu=workaround_bios_bug if you really want VT-d
(XEN) Failed to parse ACPI DMAR.  Disabling VT-d.

apic_id 10 is the one described under the non-INCLUDE_PCI_ALL DRHD,
which is not materialized on the PCI bus.  The DMAR effectively breaks
down to:

DMAR
 - INTR_REMAP set

DRHD0
 - INCLUDE_PCI_ALL set
 - scope includes IOAPIC 8 & 0

DRHD1
 - INCLUDE_PCI_ALL *NOT* set
 - scope includes various PCI sub-hierarchies *AND* IOAPIC 10

DRHD0 and DRHD1 are on the same PCI segment (0x0) and are peers of one
another, so it's not possible to set INCLUDE_PCI_ALL on both DRHDs, and
it's incorrect to list IOAPIC 10 under DRHD0.

Thanks,

Alex


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel