[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]x86: Fix possible S3 suspend hangs
Oh, don't worry about it. It's more obvious than I first thought! -- Keir On 12/03/2010 07:20, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not doubting this race exists, but could you briefly give an example of an > offlining scenario that would hit the hang? And explain the result: is it > that the offliner thinks the operation doesn't complete and spins forever in > __cpu_die()? > > -- Keir > > On 12/03/2010 03:42, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> X86: Fix possible S3 suspend hangs >> >> It is possible for cpu to become offlined before irq disabled in idle loop, >> which will cause this cpu stay in C state and can't wakeup to play dead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> diff -r 132ac04cbdba xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Tue Mar 09 18:18:19 2010 +0000 >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Fri Mar 12 11:07:43 2010 +0800 >> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ static void acpi_processor_idle(void) >> */ >> local_irq_disable(); >> >> - if ( softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) ) >> + if ( softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) || >> + cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()) ) >> { >> local_irq_enable(); >> sched_tick_resume(); >> diff -r 132ac04cbdba xen/arch/x86/domain.c >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c Tue Mar 09 18:18:19 2010 +0000 >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c Fri Mar 12 11:12:24 2010 +0800 >> @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ static void default_idle(void) >> static void default_idle(void) >> { >> local_irq_disable(); >> - if ( !softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) ) >> + if ( !softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) && >> + cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) ) >> safe_halt(); >> else >> local_irq_enable(); > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |