[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
- To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:25:39 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:30:20 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HK3RNYAWB44jFW5uOAz9jsvMrGBRQcHEelEVh2HmZXFK7SXwOnUYxy7vAvobSa7miSUYPwiR06ZkeCEcTTZ3YjXf9uq9UPfVxmB5fPJ2CmVVA0p0yV5nOwIPg2C6ZOIPsLDo6mpPNbzu+kSQINiq5xIoE5X0giEzU8P7++TZVD4=;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Per yours feed it seems it makes sense try load patched Xen 4-0.rc6 with 2.6.32.9 (stable). It would be a fair . Right ?
Boris.
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 3:10 PM
On 03/12/2010 07:01 AM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> I've applied attached patch to the most recent clone of
xen-unstable.hg
> Checked out branch xen/pvhvm-stefano and built 2.6.31.6 pvops kernel
> based on this branch.
> Xen Host reboots right away.
>
Can you tell whether its Xen itself crashing, or if the dom0 kernel is crashing?
Once Xen is patched, it should be sufficient to run a patched domU hvm kernel (you don't need to update your dom0 kernel).
J
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
