[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
- To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:08:34 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:08:57 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4usBVRWS+hoCFTQJ5bIiV+RBlabdMv4tHBGV7dewA40NNV9XcxDUcA0GvWiakKj/k5E1RukeDp91AFhyd8owmC5bUfdD+QV7KwMmq0lfwbOTZxIGYqtEu80a5lNpcmZVqRfNU30xZLKqeBSanapHdIe/0WQdJMB/KELEspI9tz0=;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Yes.
I can load 2.6.32.9 ( been built via xen/stable just now) under then most recent Xen 4.0 (matching tip CS Xen's rpms have been rebuilt and reinstalled on F12 following Michael Young ) via clone of original xen-unstable tree patched per Steffano :-
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-03/msg00452.html
Boris.
--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Boris Derzhavets"
<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 4:29 PM
On 03/12/2010 01:25 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Per yours feed it seems it makes sense try load patched Xen 4-0.rc6 with 2.6.32.9 (stable). It would be a fair . Right ?
>
Yes, that should work. There's no need for dom0 to have either Stefano's or Sheng's patches.
J
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
