[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
On 03/12/2010 02:13 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Yes. That's what i see on my box.
OK, over to you Stefano. Why is Boris seeing an instacrash in dom0 with
your patches in place?
J
Boris.
--- On *Fri, 3/12/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge /<jeremy@xxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sheng Yang"
<sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stefano Stabellini"
<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 5:11 PM
On 03/12/2010 02:08 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Yes.
> I can load 2.6.32.9 ( been built via xen/stable just now) under
then most recent Xen 4.0 (matching tip CS Xen's rpms have been
rebuilt and reinstalled on F12 following Michael Young ) via clone
of original xen-unstable tree patched per Steffano :-
>
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-03/msg00452.html
>
Are you saying that a patched Xen with unpatched dom0 does not
crash, but patched dom0 does crash?
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
