[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [patch] cpufreq: fix statistic lock problem
cpufreq: fix statistic lock problem cpufreq_statistic_lock should not only protect the statistic memory pointed by cpufreq_statistic_data[cpu], but also have to protect the pointer in cpufreq_statistic_data[cpu] itself. So move the read operation of cpufreq_statistic_data[cpu] after spin_lock(cpufreq_statistic_lock). Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> diff -r f7aeab5b7796 xen/drivers/cpufreq/utility.c --- a/xen/drivers/cpufreq/utility.c Wed Mar 24 17:05:16 2010 +0800 +++ b/xen/drivers/cpufreq/utility.c Thu Mar 25 16:58:44 2010 +0800 @@ -63,13 +63,14 @@ void cpufreq_residency_update(unsigned i void cpufreq_statistic_update(unsigned int cpu, uint8_t from, uint8_t to) { - struct pm_px *pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpu]; + struct pm_px *pxpt; struct processor_pminfo *pmpt = processor_pminfo[cpu]; spinlock_t *cpufreq_statistic_lock = &per_cpu(cpufreq_statistic_lock, cpu); spin_lock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); + pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpu]; if ( !pxpt || !pmpt ) { spin_unlock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); return; @@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ int cpufreq_statistic_init(unsigned int int cpufreq_statistic_init(unsigned int cpuid) { uint32_t i, count; - struct pm_px *pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpuid]; + struct pm_px *pxpt; const struct processor_pminfo *pmpt = processor_pminfo[cpuid]; spinlock_t *cpufreq_statistic_lock = &per_cpu(cpufreq_statistic_lock, cpuid); @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ int cpufreq_statistic_init(unsigned int spin_lock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); + pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpuid]; if ( pxpt ) { spin_unlock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); return 0; @@ -148,12 +150,13 @@ int cpufreq_statistic_init(unsigned int void cpufreq_statistic_exit(unsigned int cpuid) { - struct pm_px *pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpuid]; + struct pm_px *pxpt; spinlock_t *cpufreq_statistic_lock = &per_cpu(cpufreq_statistic_lock, cpuid); spin_lock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); + pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpuid]; if (!pxpt) { spin_unlock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); return; @@ -170,13 +173,14 @@ void cpufreq_statistic_reset(unsigned in void cpufreq_statistic_reset(unsigned int cpuid) { uint32_t i, j, count; - struct pm_px *pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpuid]; + struct pm_px *pxpt; const struct processor_pminfo *pmpt = processor_pminfo[cpuid]; spinlock_t *cpufreq_statistic_lock = &per_cpu(cpufreq_statistic_lock, cpuid); spin_lock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); + pxpt = cpufreq_statistic_data[cpuid]; if ( !pmpt || !pxpt || !pxpt->u.pt || !pxpt->u.trans_pt ) { spin_unlock(cpufreq_statistic_lock); return; Attachment:
fix-cpufreq-stat-lock.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |