Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/11] libxl: Provide libxl_domain_rename

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 26/03/10 10:23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> You are confused.  The purpose of this check is to check that the
> existing name is as expected, not that the name is not unique
> (although the lack of checking that the name is unique is also a bug).
I'm not confused, there's no need to check anything, libxl is here to 
plumb whatever name the user of the library has chosen for its domain 
into a xenstore entry: the name is opaque to libxl, and should remains 
as such.
if you want some kind of migration lock, put in xl where you define the 
policy.
> 0 is a perfectly acceptable null pointer constant.
working != acceptable.

--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel