[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] (Xenlinux) gentoo-xen-kernel patches questions?
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:17:09 -0700 <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 04/02/2010 11:03 AM, Mike Viau wrote: > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>I noticed that the Xenlinux 2.6.33 patches are tagged as being > > "Deprecated" but the 2.6.31 are not. > > >> > > >>May I ask why? > > >> > > >>http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list?can=1&q=&colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount > > >> > > >> > > > Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:15:09 -0400 <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > No idea. But those patches are pursuing an entirely different method of > > > getting Linux to work in privileged state (Dom0). The current > > > development is with the pv-ops one: > > > > > > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps > > > > > > > I am currently using the unstable version of debain's pvops xen kernel. > > > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 > > > > It appears to have functioning networking and block devices which is > > nice, but I have experienced some instabilities such as kernel dumping > > on reboots. Unfortunately I do not have a console setup to log kernel > > messages for this machine. > > That would be interesting to see. I have also seen oops messages on > reboot, if you reboot while domains are still running. For me, at > least, it appears to be a bug in blktap2. It would be useful if you > could confirm that's what your crashes are, or if its something else.
Just paid for another term at school, so when I get some more cash I plan to go pickup an add-in serial card for my server and setup kernel logging to capture the messages on my laptop.
> > > Would compiling the pv_ops kernel from the git repository produce any > > additional stability? > > I'm not really sure what the Debian image is built from, so its hard to > say. I'm getting the impression that their build is pretty closely > tracking xen.git now. Are you seeing any other stability problems?
Firstly I am still in the process of testing but....
I don't have figures (benchmark results) on this however on my setup I noticed a decreasing disk IO responsiveness as uptime increased. The disk access returned to near native performance after a reboot though.
On that note about rebooting, the machine seemed to reboot fine when only the Domian 0 was left running. Since I have not tested any DomUs without networking it is possible that is due to a bug in blktap2.
> Because, honestly, a crash while rebooting is annoying and should be > fixed, it doesn't really count as a stability problem if you're > rebooting anyway ;). (Unless it either prevents the reboot from > working, or causes data-corruption on disk.) >
Agreed, though I would tend to be more worried if I didn't have physical access to the box, which in this home scaled project I thankfully do.
Lastly, I must thank you Jeremy for all your hard work and contribution made to the Xen community :)
> > It was my understanding that one could run a stable Xen systems today > > with a Xenlinux kernel, as pv_ops was still in development. I've read > > on the XenParavirtsOps page that there are features available to Xen > > but are not yet available in the pv_ops kernel (perhaps this wiki has > > not been updated as I understand Xen 4.0 release is just around the > > corner!): > > I'm pretty sure the Debian kernel is pvops based, so any caveats or > limitations of one apply to the other. > > J > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
-M
Got a phone? Get Hotmail & Messenger for mobile!
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|