[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [retry 4] 3/3 Add support for AMD MPERF/APERF
# HG changeset patch # User mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx # Date 1270782828 18000 # Node ID 8ac3bfb7382cf46831844050ba148cae7869f909 # Parent 5a13dbfb4b7d7d5514dd91708a0f4f96f9a50cbe Starting with Family 0x10, model 10 processors, some AMD processors will have support for the APERF/MPERF MSRs. This patch adds the checks necessary to support those MSRs. It also makes the get_measured_perf function defined inside cpufreq.c driver independent. max_freq is taken from the policy definition instead of being a private argument in struct acpi_cpufreq_data. The struct member is entirely removed from the function since it is no longer used. Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> diff -r 5a13dbfb4b7d -r 8ac3bfb7382c xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c Thu Apr 08 16:38:14 2010 -0500 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c Thu Apr 08 22:13:48 2010 -0500 @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ * Only IA32_APERF/IA32_MPERF ratio is architecturally defined and * no meaning should be associated with absolute values of these MSRs. */ -static unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int flag) +unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int flag) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy; struct perf_pair readin, cur, *saved; @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ #endif - retval = drv_data[policy->cpu]->max_freq * perf_percent / 100; + retval = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * perf_percent / 100; return retval; } @@ -582,7 +582,6 @@ policy->governor = cpufreq_opt_governor ? : CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_GOVERNOR; - data->max_freq = perf->states[0].core_frequency * 1000; /* table init */ for (i=0; i<perf->state_count; i++) { if (i>0 && perf->states[i].core_frequency >= diff -r 5a13dbfb4b7d -r 8ac3bfb7382c xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c Thu Apr 08 16:38:14 2010 -0500 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c Thu Apr 08 22:13:48 2010 -0500 @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ #include <acpi/acpi.h> #include <acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h> +#define CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY (0x1) #define CPUID_FREQ_VOLT_CAPABILITIES 0x80000007 #define CPB_CAPABLE 0x00000200 #define USE_HW_PSTATE 0x00000080 @@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ static struct powernow_cpufreq_data *drv_data[NR_CPUS]; +static struct cpufreq_driver powernow_cpufreq_driver; + struct drv_cmd { unsigned int type; cpumask_t mask; @@ -249,6 +252,10 @@ if (c->cpuid_level >= 6) { unsigned int edx; + unsigned int ecx; + ecx = cpuid_ecx(6); + if (ecx & CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY) + powernow_cpufreq_driver.getavg = get_measured_perf; edx = cpuid_edx(CPUID_FREQ_VOLT_CAPABILITIES); if ((edx & CPB_CAPABLE) == CPB_CAPABLE) { policy->turbo = CPUFREQ_TURBO_ENABLED; diff -r 5a13dbfb4b7d -r 8ac3bfb7382c xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h --- a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h Thu Apr 08 16:38:14 2010 -0500 +++ b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h Thu Apr 08 22:13:48 2010 -0500 @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data { struct processor_performance *acpi_data; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; - unsigned int max_freq; unsigned int cpu_feature; }; diff -r 5a13dbfb4b7d -r 8ac3bfb7382c xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h --- a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h Thu Apr 08 16:38:14 2010 -0500 +++ b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h Thu Apr 08 22:13:48 2010 -0500 @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ int get_cpu_id(u8); int powernow_cpufreq_init(void); unsigned int powernow_register_driver(void); +unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int flag); void cpufreq_residency_update(unsigned int, uint8_t); void cpufreq_statistic_update(unsigned int, uint8_t, uint8_t); int cpufreq_statistic_init(unsigned int); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |